Sunday, November 18, 2012

A Sticky Floors and Salty Popcorn Movie Review: Lincoln


There's no way I can be objective about Steven Spielberg's new biopic. 

At its center is my favorite actor of all-time, a gifted character bard (Daniel Day-Lewis) who I'd be ecstatic to play the role of a jar of mustard. Surrounded by an ensemble featuring standouts from some of my favorite films in recent memory (Tommy Lee Jones-No Country for Old Men, Jackie Earle Haley-Watchmen, Joseph Gordon-Levitt-Inception, David Straitharn-Good Night, and Good Luck, Hal Holbrook-That Evening Sun, Time Blake Nelson-O Brother, Where art Thou?, Michael Stuhlbarg-A Serious Man, and the incomparable James Spader), and its promise of casting a more personal light on arguably America's most mythic true-to-life character, and there was really no way this movie could fail. I'd have been pleased, if as Aaron Sorkin suggested he'd do with his Steve Jobs biopic earlier this week, we'd had Day-Lewis' Lincoln eating short ribs in the White House kitchen for two and a half hours.

But Spielberg knocked my socks off.

Those wanting a sprawling portrait of the man will be discouraged. For the most part, Lincoln confines itself to one tumultuous month in American history. As the film opens, Lincoln has just been re-elected in 1865. The country remains very much in the throes of the Civil War. Yet Lincoln's Republican Party (with Holbrook and Jones in major positions of authority) has just roundly defeated their Democrat rivals in the chaotic House of Representatives. What unfolds during the film's lengthy run-time (perhaps my only compliant) is Lincoln's personal struggle to get the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery passed through a deeply divided, lame-duck House as the Civil War limps toward its conclusion. Aside from two chaotic scenes, one at the beginning of the film and the aftermath of the Petersburg, Virginia, battle, the war takes a backseat to a display of Lincoln's political acumen, and his meandering thoughts during the month the amendment is under discussion in the House.

And that's the best way to describe Day-Lewis' Lincoln. He is a meandering intellectual, often draped in a blanket and stooped in thought. Spielberg shows a particular enthusiasm for a shot directly over Day-Lewis shoulder, peering into the gaze of those addressing the president with the familiar stove hat and chin whiskers framing the shot. This achieves both a narrative and cinematic significance. Lincoln often appears aloof (so much so that one of his advisers storms out of the room during a particularly lengthy aside), and by framing the shot so Spielberg plays up this side of Lincoln's character. It also allows him to play up the myth of Lincoln while simultaneously displaying a complex human side in other scenes, heretofore ignored on the big screen. This seamless transition, from concerned father to backwoods Kentucky boy to shrewd politician, is deftly maneuvered by Day-Lewis, who once again puts himself into Oscar contention with this performance.

Like the man himself, much of the rest of the film orbits around Lincoln. This is a political intrigue film, and while the pay-off screams Hollywood drama to the point of almost becoming a caricature, the craftsmanship of those that surround Day-Lewis keep the story from going off the deep end. Straitharn once again plays the wizened compatriot to a tee, occupying the difficult role of Secretary of State and confidant William Seward with ease and comfort. Perhaps the brightest surprise in this cast is James Spader's turn as political consultant/oaf W.N. Bilbo, replete with grand moustache and political cynicism that keeps the proceedings light, even as the audience is aware the film is headed toward a less-than-spectacular end.

Which is where my main gripe springs forth. Lincoln attempts to do many brave things with a story that is told in second-grade classrooms nationwide. We all know what's going to happen. How we get there is intellectually stimulating (for a politics nerd) and even shocking (a heated scene between Sally Field's Mary Todd Lincoln and Day-Lewis, scolding her for a discent into madness that Lincoln, the president, can't succumb to in order to keep up appearances is perhaps the most tension-filled and bold decision Spielberg and screenwriter Tony Kushner make in Lincoln). But the final 20 minutes of the film feel tacked on. 

There are four or five good ways for the film to end before the well-tread territory of Ford's Theater. And the decision of how to treat the shooting involves some sleight-of-hand that isn't apparent to the audience until after the infamous deed takes place. The decision to jump around in time, completely in service of providing the expected scene of Lincoln's death yet also ending on an up-note with the president's address following the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, is jarring, odd and unnecessary in an otherwise thoughtful and intimate portrait of our most mythic president. For much of the film, it seems as though Spielberg is trying to tear down that wall of fame that separates us from a man who, as Field's first lady tells us, is defined by the challenges he had to face in office and his dramatic assassination. Instead of leaving us with an enduring image of Lincoln the man, we are given one final image of Lincoln the god as the credits roll. It's a small nit to pick in a film that bravely charts a course into well-trod territory, tying together themes and ideas we thought understood and put to bed 150 years ago.

Verdict: 4.5/5 stars

No comments:

Post a Comment